Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746326›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Machine learning reveals the waggle drift's role in the honey bee dance communication system.

David M Dormagen, Benjamin Wild, Fernando Wario, Tim Landgraf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The audience shapes the information content of the honey bee waggle dance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David M DormagenDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-668X
Benjamin WildDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-8448
Fernando WarioDepartment of Electronics, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, 44430 Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-1946
Tim LandgrafDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversidad de Guadalajara · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honey bee waggle dance is one of the most prominent examples of abstract communication among animals: successful foragers convey new resource locations to interested followers via characteristic "dance" movements in the nest, where dances advertise different locations on different overlapping subregions of the "dance floor." To this day, this spatial separation has not been described in detail, and it remains unknown how it affects the dance communication. Here, we evaluate long-term recordings of

Indexed as

animal behaviorApis melliferaentomologymachine learningneural networks

Identifiers

PMID37746326
PMCPMC10516631
OpenAlexW4386160203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.