ArticleFrontiers in fungal biology2022
Molecular-Based Diversity Studies and Field Surveys Are Not Mutually Exclusive: On the Importance of Integrated Methodologies in Mycological Research.
Article in Frontiers in fungal biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Platform Mushroom Cultivation for STEM Education: AI-Assisted Environmental Monitoring and Student Perceptions.Education sciences · 2026Article
- Systematic Assessment of the Impact of Targeted Selection Methods and Environment-Mimicking Culture Conditions on Fungal Natural Product Libraries.Journal of natural products · 2026Article
- Amazonian Fungal Diversity and the Potential of Basidiomycetes as Sources of Novel Antimicrobials.Biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Assessing macrofungal diversity to identify conservation priority areas: a case study from the southern section of the Hengduan Mountains, China.IMA fungus · 2026Article
- The first checklist of fungi known for Honduras: revealing taxonomic, geographical, and functional trends.MycoKeys · 2025Article
- Article
- Standard deviation: Standardized bat monitoring techniques work better in some ecosystems.PloS one · 2024Article
- Chemical Characterization and Metagenomic Identification of Endophytic Microbiome from South African Sunflower (Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Two new species ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2022Article
- Hyperparasitic Fungi on Black Mildews (Meliolales, Ascomycota): Hidden Fungal Diversity in the Tropics.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2022Review
- Fungal species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Washington wine grapes and California table grapes, with novelties in the generaFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022Article
- The power of citizen science to advance fungal conservation.Conservation lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding and describing the diversity of living organisms is a great challenge. Fungi have for a long time been, and unfortunately still are, underestimated when it comes to taxonomic research. The foundations were laid by the first mycologists through field observations. These important fundamental works have been and remain vital reference works. Nevertheless, a non-negligible part of the studied funga escaped their attention. Thanks to modern developments in molecular techniques, the study of fungal diversity has been revolutionized in terms of tools and knowledge. Despite a number of disadvantages inherent to these techniques, traditional field-based inventory work has been increasingly superseded and neglected. This perspective aims to demonstrate the central importance of field-based research in fungal diversity studies, and encourages researchers not to be blinded by the sole use of molecular methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.