Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746161›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in fungal biology2022

Strategy of Nematophagous Fungi in Determining the Activity of Plant Parasitic Nematodes and Their Prospective Role in Sustainable Agriculture.

Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-Ani, Filippe Elias de Freitas Soares, Ashutosh Sharma, Sergio de Los Santos-Villalobos, Ana Victoria Valdivia-Padilla, Liliana Aguilar-Marcelino

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in fungal biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TargetingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-AniDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Filippe Elias de Freitas SoaresDepartment of Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Ashutosh SharmaTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Centre of Bioengineering, Queretaro, Mexico.
Sergio de Los Santos-VillalobosInstituto Tecnológico de Sonora, Ciudad Obregón, México.
Ana Victoria Valdivia-PadillaTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Centre of Bioengineering, Queretaro, Mexico.
Liliana Aguilar-MarcelinoCentro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Salud Animal e Inocuidad, INIFAP, Jiutepec, Mexico.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias · MXSonora Institute of Technology · MXUniversidade Federal de Lavras · BRUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we supply a framework for the importance of nematophagous fungi (nematophagous fungi [NF]) and their role in agricultural ecosystems. We characterize the taxonomy, diversity, ecology, and type of NF, depending on their interaction with plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs). We described potential mechanisms of NF in the control of PPNs, the efficiency and methods of utilization, and the use of nematicides in sustainable agriculture. We explain the utilization of NF in nanotechnology as a new approach. NF are significant in the soil for having the effective potential for use in sustainable agriculture. These types of fungi belong to wide taxa groups, such as Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and other groups. Diverse NF are available in different kinds of soil, especially in soils that contain high densities of nematodes. There is a relationship between the environment of nematodes and NF. NF can be divided into two types according to the mechanisms that affect nematodes. These types are divided into direct or indirect effects. The direct effects include the following: ectoparasites, endoparasites, cyst, or egg parasites producing toxins, and attack tools as special devices. However, the indirect effect comprises two groups: paralyzing toxins and the effect on the life cycle of nematodes. We explained the molecular mechanisms for determining the suitable conditions in brief and clarified the potential for increasing the efficacy of NF to highly impact sustainable agriculture in two ways: directly and indirectly.

Indexed as

Fusariummelaninnematode-trapping funginon-pathogenicPleurotusTrichoderma

Identifiers

PMID37746161
PMCPMC10512347
OpenAlexW4280589119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.