ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Groupwise structural sparsity for discriminative voxels identification.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the selection of voxels for functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) brain data. We aim to identify a comprehensive set of discriminative voxels associated with human learning when exposed to a neutral visual stimulus that predicts an aversive outcome. However, due to the nature of the unconditioned stimuli (typically a noxious stimulus), it is challenging to obtain sufficient sample sizes for psychological experiments, given the tolerability of the subjects and ethical considerations. We propose a stable hierarchical voting (SHV) mechanism based on stability selection to address this challenge. This mechanism enables us to evaluate the quality of spatial random sampling and minimizes the risk of false and missed detections. We assess the performance of the proposed algorithm using simulated and publicly available datasets. The experiments demonstrate that the regularization strategy choice significantly affects the results' interpretability. When applying our algorithm to our collected fMRI dataset, it successfully identifies sparse and closely related patterns across subjects and displays stable weight maps for three experimental phases under the fear conditioning paradigm. These findings strongly support the causal role of aversive conditioning in altering visual-cortical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.