Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

DME-DeepLabV3+: a lightweight model for diabetic macular edema extraction based on DeepLabV3+ architecture.

Yun Bai, Jing Li, Lianjun Shi, Qin Jiang, Biao Yan, Zhenhua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun BaiCollege of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Jing LiCollege of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Lianjun ShiThe Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qin JiangThe Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Biao YanEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenhua WangCollege of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision impairment in the patients with diabetes. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an important ophthalmic imaging method, which can enable early detection of DME. However, it is difficult to achieve high-efficiency and high-precision extraction of DME in OCT images because the sources of OCT images are diverse and the quality of OCT images is not stable. Thus, it is still required to design a model to improve the accuracy of DME extraction in OCT images. Methods: A lightweight model (DME-DeepLabV3+) was proposed for DME extraction using a DeepLabV3+ architecture. In this model, MobileNetV2 model was used as the backbone for extracting low-level features of DME. The improved ASPP with sawtooth wave-like dilation rate was used for extracting high-level features of DME. Then, the decoder was used to fuse and refine low-level and high-level features of DME. Finally, 1711 OCT images were collected from the Kermany dataset and the Affiliated Eye Hospital. 1369, 171, and 171 OCT images were randomly selected for training, validation, and testing, respectively. Conclusion: In ablation experiment, the proposed DME-DeepLabV3+ model was compared against DeepLabV3+ model with different setting to evaluate the effects of MobileNetV2 and improved ASPP on DME extraction. DME-DeepLabV3+ had better extraction performance, especially in small-scale macular edema regions. The extraction results of DME-DeepLabV3+ were close to ground truth. In comparative experiment, the proposed DME-DeepLabV3+ model was compared against other models, including FCN, UNet, PSPNet, ICNet, and DANet, to evaluate DME extraction performance. DME-DeepLabV3+ model had better DME extraction performance than other models as shown by greater pixel accuracy (PA), mean pixel accuracy (MPA), precision (Pre), recall (Re), F1-score (F1), and mean Intersection over Union (MIoU), which were 98.71%, 95.23%, 91.19%, 91.12%, 91.15%, and 91.18%, respectively. Discussion: DME-DeepLabV3+ model is suitable for DME extraction in OCT images and can assist the ophthalmologists in the management of ocular diseases.

Indexed as

DeepLabV3+deep learningdiabetic macular edemaextraction modeloptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID37746086
PMCPMC10515718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.