Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745937›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Characterization of key information sections in informed consent forms posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Luke Gelinas, Walker Morrell, Tony Tse, Ava Glazier, Deborah A Zarin, Barbara E Bierer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luke GelinasAdvarra Inc., Columbia, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6277-148X
Walker MorrellDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tony TseNational Center for Biotechnology Innovation, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ava GlazierDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Deborah A ZarinDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara E BiererDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent revisions to the US Federal Common Rule governing human studies funded or conducted by the federal government require the provision of a "concise and focused" key information (KI) section in informed consent forms (ICFs). We performed a systematic study to characterize KI sections of ICFs for federally funded trials available on ClinicalTrials.gov. Methods: We downloaded ICFs posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for treatment trials initiated on or after the revised Common Rule effective date. Trial records ( Results: Of the 102 trial records, 76 had identifiable KI sections that were, on average, 10% of the total length of full ICF documents. KI readability grade level was not notably different from other sections of ICFs. Most KI sections were distinguished by section headers and included lists but contained few other formatting elements. Most KI sections included a subset of topics consistent with the basic elements of informed consent specified in the Common Rule. Conclusion: Many of the KI sections in the study sample aligned with practices suggested in the preamble to the revised Common Rule. Further, our results suggest that some KI sections were tailored in study-specific ways. Nevertheless, guidelines on how to write concise and comprehensible KI sections would improve the utility and readability of KI sections.

Indexed as

common ruleethicsInformed consentkey informationregulations

Identifiers

PMID37745937
PMCPMC10514692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.