ArticleJournal of cytology
The Role of Novel Tiered Reporting System in Serous Fluid Cytology and Risk of Malignancy Assessment: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Navigating the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology in pericardial effusion: A meta-analysis.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serous effusion cytology (SEC) reporting is important for the management of the cancer patient. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (ISRSFC) provides tiered reporting terminology to standardize practice, looking into the risk of malignancy (MAL) for each category. In this study, we have assessed the utility of the ISRSFC and reported our experience at a tertiary cancer center. Materials and Methods: Serous fluid cytology reported from January 2019 to December 2020 was categorized according to ISRSFC diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic (ND), negative for MAL (NFM), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), suspicious for MAL (SFM), and MAL. The risk of MAL (ROM) and performance parameters were calculated. Results: A total of 2150 serous effusions including 1160 pleural, 929 peritoneal, and 61 pericardial effusions from 2071 patients were reported. There were 742 males and 1329 females. The patient's age ranged from less than 1 yr to 95 years. The volume of the sample ranged from 0.5 ml to 2000 ml. There were 114 ND (5.32%), 1068 NFM (49.67%), 144 AUS (6.69%), 82 SFM (3.81%), and 742 MAL (34.51%) cases. Adenocarcinoma was the most common MAL involving serous fluids (91.50%). The calculated ROM was 15.38% for ND, 24.26% for NFM, 62.96% for AUS, 79.16% for SFM, and 100% for MAL. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were, respectively, 68.04%, 96.96%, 96.35%, 72.07%, and 81.33%. Conclusion: ISRSFC provides consistent reporting terminology and the ROM for each category aids in clinical correlation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.