ArticleInverse problems2022
Unsupervised knowledge-transfer for learned image reconstruction.
Article in Inverse problems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-dose CT reconstruction using dataset-free learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Deep-learning based image reconstruction for MRI-guided near-infrared spectral tomography.Optica · 2022Article
- Ex vivo validation of photo-magnetic imaging.Optics letters · 2017Article
- An extended analytical approach for diffuse optical imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2015Article
- Fully linear reconstruction method for fluorescence yield and lifetime through inverse complex-source formulation: simulation studies.Optics letters · 2010Article
- Feasibility of diffuse optical imaging with long-lived luminescent probes.Optics letters · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning-based image reconstruction approaches have demonstrated impressive empirical performance in many imaging modalities. These approaches usually require a large amount of high-quality paired training data, which is often not available in medical imaging. To circumvent this issue we develop a novel unsupervised knowledge-transfer paradigm for learned reconstruction within a Bayesian framework. The proposed approach learns a reconstruction network in two phases. The first phase trains a reconstruction network with a set of ordered pairs comprising of ground truth images of ellipses and the corresponding simulated measurement data. The second phase fine-tunes the pretrained network to more realistic measurement data without supervision. By construction, the framework is capable of delivering predictive uncertainty information over the reconstructed image. We present extensive experimental results on low-dose and sparse-view computed tomography showing that the approach is competitive with several state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised reconstruction techniques. Moreover, for test data distributed differently from the training data, the proposed framework can significantly improve reconstruction quality not only visually, but also quantitatively in terms of PSNR and SSIM, when compared with learned methods trained on the synthetic dataset only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.