ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Interpretable machine learning for prediction of clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning models of segmentation in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Predicting Stroke Risk Stratification Using Multiomics Data: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Baseline Neurological Severity and Early Imaging Findings Predict 3-Month Functional Outcome in Anterior-Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating serum neurotrophin profiles and quantitative EEG for predicting motor outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Mechanisms and integrative machine learning approaches to blood-brain barrier biomarker profiling for personalized ischemic stroke management.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Prediction of Early Hospital Admission (≤24 Hours) After Stroke Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Multicenter Study From China.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Construction and Validation of a 90-Day Mortality Risk Prediction Model Based on Interpretable Machine Learning for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting post-stroke functional outcome using explainable machine learning and integrated data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- TrustNet: a lightweight network with integrated uncertainty quantification and quantitative explainable AI for ischemic stroke detection in CT images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating serum globulin into the ICF framework: a novel multidimensional predictive model for 1-year mRS outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission risk in day surgery lung cancer patients after lobectomy or sublobectomy: a real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An evaluation based on explainable machine learning: analysis of risk factors for enteral nutrition-related diarrhea in patients with severe stroke.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model integrating baseline multimodal CT perfusion and clinical data for predicting 9-month functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- AI post-intervention operational and functional outcomes prediction in ischemic stroke patients using MRIs.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Dynamic, Interpretable, Machine Learning-Based Outcome Prediction as a New Emerging Opportunity in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Stroke research and treatment · 2025Article
- The anesthesiologist's guide to critically assessing machine learning research: a narrative review.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Review
- Machine learning-based predictive model for the development of thrombolysis resistance in patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Leveraging multivariate analysis and adjusted mutual information to improve stroke prediction and interpretability.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review for artificial intelligence on neuroimaging in rehabilitation of ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Predicting the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial in a clinical setting for establishing suitable treatment plans. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the functional outcome of AIS patients and provides interpretable insights. Methods: We included AIS patients from a multicenter stroke registry in this prognostic study. ML-based methods were utilized to predict 3-month functional outcomes, which were categorized as either favorable [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2] or unfavorable (mRS ≥ 3). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to identify significant features and interpret their contributions to the predictions of the model. Results: The dataset comprised a derivation set of 3,687 patients and two external validation sets totaling 250 and 110 patients each. Among them, the number of unfavorable outcomes was 1,123 (30.4%) in the derivation set, and 93 (37.2%) and 32 (29.1%) in external sets A and B, respectively. Among the ML models used, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the best performance. It achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.790 (95% CI: 0.775-0.806) on the internal test set and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.733-0.848) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.798-0.948) on the two external test sets, respectively. The key features for predicting functional outcomes were the initial NIHSS, early neurologic deterioration (END), age, and white blood cell count. The END displayed noticeable interactions with several other features. Conclusion: ML algorithms demonstrated proficient prediction for the 3-month functional outcome in AIS patients. With the aid of the SHAP method, we can attain an in-depth understanding of how critical features contribute to model predictions and how changes in these features influence such predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.