Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745645›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2023

Use of Linked Nordic Registries for Population Studies in Hematologic Cancers: The Case of Multiple Myeloma.

Niels Abildgaard, Jonatan Freilich, Pekka Anttila, Nawal Bent-Ennakhil, Yuanjun Ma, Mariann Lassenius, Sigurd Ørstavik, Iiro Toppila, Anders Waage, Ingemar Turesson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of survival and functional outcomes after spinal surgery for multiple myeloma: a nationwide study of 200 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Automated data collection in cancer care: State of play among registries in the United Kingdom and Europe.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Niels AbildgaardHematology Research Unit, Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jonatan FreilichDepartment of Access Consulting, PAREXEL International, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pekka AnttilaComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Nawal Bent-EnnakhilTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yuanjun MaDepartment of Access Consulting, PAREXEL International, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mariann LasseniusMedaffcon, Espoo, Finland.
Sigurd ØrstavikTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Oslo, Norway.
Iiro ToppilaMedaffcon, Espoo, Finland.
Anders WaageDepartment of Hematology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ingemar TuressonLund University Cancer Centre, University of Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Markus HanssonSahlgrenska Academy and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7715-4548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Linked health-care registries and high coverage in Nordic countries lend themselves well to epidemiologic research. Given its relatively high incidence in Western Europe, complexity in diagnosis, and challenges in registration, multiple myeloma (MM) was selected to compare registries in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from four archetypal registries in each country (spanning January 2005-October 2018): National Patient Registry (NPR), Prescribed Drug Registry (PDR), Cancer Registry (CR), and Cause of Death Registry. Patients newly diagnosed with MM who received MM-specific treatment were included. PDR/NPR treatment records were used to assess incident NPR cases. The registration quality of MM-specific drugs in the PDR of each country was also evaluated. Results: In Denmark, only 6% of patients in the NPR were not registered in the CR; in Sweden, it was 16.9%. No systematic differences were identified that could explain this discrepancy. In Denmark, lenalidomide and bortezomib were registered in the NPR with high coverage, but less expensive drugs typically given in combination with bortezomib were not covered in any of the registries. In Finland and Sweden, bortezomib records were not identified in the PDR, but some were in the NPR; other drugs had good coverage in the PDR. Conclusions: The registries evaluated in this study can be used to identify the MM population; however, given the gaps in MM registration in the Finnish and Swedish CRs, Danish registries provide the most comprehensive datasets for research on treatment patterns for MM.

Indexed as

incidenceprevalencereal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID37745645
PMCPMC10516210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.