Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745489›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies for Structure-Informed Machine Learning in Kinase Drug Discovery.

David Schaller, Clara D Christ, John D Chodera, Andrea Volkamer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David SchallerIn Silico Toxicology and Structural Bioinformatics, Institute of Physiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Clara D ChristMolecular Design, Research and Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, 13342 Berlin, Germany.
John D ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Andrea VolkamerIn Silico Toxicology and Structural Bioinformatics, Institute of Physiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The role of reorganization energy in achieving selective kinase inhibition"R01GM121505 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHODERA, JOHN DAMON · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years machine learning has transformed many aspects of the drug discovery process including small molecule design for which the prediction of the bioactivity is an integral part. Leveraging structural information about the interactions between a small molecule and its protein target has great potential for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, but is fundamentally limited by the accuracy with which protein:ligand complex structures can be predicted in a reliable and automated fashion. With the goal of finding practical approaches to generating useful kinase:inhibitor complex geometries for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, we present a kinase-centric docking benchmark assessing the performance of different classes of docking and pose selection strategies to assess how well experimentally observed binding modes are recapitulated in a realistic cross-docking scenario. The assembled benchmark data set focuses on the well-studied protein kinase family and comprises a subset of 589 protein structures co-crystallized with 423 ATP-competitive ligands. We find that the docking methods biased by the co-crystallized ligand-utilizing shape overlap with or without maximum common substructure matching-are more successful in recovering binding poses than standard physics-based docking alone. Also, docking into multiple structures significantly increases the chance to generate a low RMSD docking pose. Docking utilizing an approach that combines all three methods (Posit) into structures with the most similar co-crystallized ligands according to shape and electrostatics proofed to be the most efficient way to reproduce binding poses achieving a success rate of 66.9 % across all included systems. The studied docking and pose selection strategies-which utilize the OpenEye Toolkit-were implemented into pipelines of the KinoML framework allowing automated and reliable protein:ligand complex generation for future downstream machine learning tasks. Although focused on protein kinases, we believe the general findings can also be transferred to other protein families.

Identifiers

PMID37745489
PMCPMC10515787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.