ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Neural morphology, the branching geometry of neurons and glia in the nervous system, is an essential cellular substrate of brain function and pathology. Despite the accelerating production of digital reconstructions of neural morphology in laboratories worldwide, the public accessibility of data remains a core issue in neuroscience. Deficiencies in the availability of existing data create redundancy of research efforts and prevent researchers from building on others' work. Data sharing complements the development of computational resources and literature mining tools to accelerate scientific discovery. Results: We carried out a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of neural morphology publications to quantify the impact of data sharing in the neuroscience community. Our findings demonstrate that sharing digital reconstructions of neural morphology via the NeuroMorpho.Org online repository leads to a significant increase of citations to the original article, thus directly benefiting the authors. Moreover, the rate of data reusage remains constant for at least 16 years after sharing (the whole period analyzed), altogether nearly doubling the peer-reviewed discoveries in the field. Furthermore, the recent availability of larger and more numerous datasets fostered integrative meta-analysis applications, which accrue on average twice the citations of re-analyses of individual datasets. We also designed and deployed an open-source citation tracking web-service that allows researchers to monitor reusage of their datasets in independent peer-reviewed reports. These results and the released tool can facilitate the recognition of shared data reuse for promotion and tenure considerations, merit evaluations, and funding decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.