Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745196›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2023

Patient-reported outcome, perception and satisfaction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Kigali, Rwanda.

Martin Nyundo, King Kayondo, Miguel Gasakure, Jean Christian Urimubabo, Jean Jacques Houben, Augustin Limgba, Antoine Nifasha, Julien Gashegu, Olivier Detry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin NyundoDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
King KayondoDepartment of Surgery, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Miguel GasakureDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
Jean Christian UrimubaboDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
Jean Jacques HoubenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
Augustin LimgbaDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, King Faisal Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Antoine NifashaDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
Julien GasheguDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.
Olivier DetryDepartment of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liège, University of Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for many abdominal surgeries. Laparoscopic programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and in sub-Saharan Africa face many constraints, although its use is safe, feasible, and clinically beneficial. The authors assessed patient-reported outcomes and the experience of patients operated on at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK). Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study combining medical data from medical files and information collected from telephone calls to 288 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at CHUK from January 2015 to December 2020. Results: Among 446 laparoscopic surgeries performed at CHUK over 6 years, cholecystectomies accounted for 64.6 % of cases (288/446). Postoperative complications and mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were low, respectively 1.7 % and 0.7 %, while the median length of stay was 3 days. About 74 % of surveyed patients had never heard of laparoscopic surgery prior to their procedure. Knowledge of laparoscopic surgery was associated with patient education level (p < 0.001). Half of patients had not been involved in the choice of the surgical technique. Overall satisfaction was over 95 % and >90 % of patients consider laparoscopic surgery as the best surgical approach in Rwanda, and for this reason they declared to be ready to promote this new technology despite its higher cost. However, patients reported some weaknesses and made recommendations for improving public awareness of laparoscopy and its benefits, patient-provider relationships, training of surgical workforce, laparoscopic equipment, and infrastructure. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed with a low rate of postoperative complications in a resource-limited setting like Rwanda. Patient satisfaction was high, but efforts should be made to improve public awareness of laparoscopic surgery, improve surgical capacity, laparoscopic equipment, and infrastructure.

Indexed as

ComplicationsExperienceLaparoscopic cholecystectomy laparoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryOutcomeSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37745196
PMCPMC10514211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.