ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology
Transperineal laser ablation as a new minimally invasive surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of existing literature.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes and safety of trans perineal laser ablation of the prostate: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for benign prostatic obstruction: 1-year clinical outcomes of a phase II study.BJU international · 2025Trial
- Transperineal laser ablation for 300-gram benign prostatic hyperplasia in an inoperable high-risk patient: Expanding the therapeutic horizon.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Transperineal Laser Ablation of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Median-Lobe Enlargement: A Single-Center Experience.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Single Fiber Transperineal Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Sexual and urinary outcomes of minimally invasive surgical therapies for LUTS/BPH: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- A Case Series on the Efficacy and Safety of Transperineal Laser Ablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Transurethral resection of the prostate in the extreme elderly (≥ 85 years): treatment success, morbidity and survival.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Anatomic and Clinical Effects of Focal Laser Ablation of the Prostate on Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Cancers · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor for the article "Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: the first 100 patients cohort of a prospective, single-center study".World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate is a new, minimally invasive technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with promising effectiveness and safety outcomes. This systematic review aims to provide an update of existing literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 up to April 2023. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed independently by three authors. Results: A total of 11 studies were included, among which 9 were observational, 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 animal study, while 2 of them were comparative (1 with prostatic artery embolization and 1 with transurethral resection of the prostate). Functional outcomes were improved in the majority of studies both for objective (maximum flow rate and post-void residual) and subjective outcomes (improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life). Complication rates ranged between 1.9% and 2.3% for hematuria, 3.7% and 36.3% for dysuria, 1.9% and 19% for acute urinary retention, 0.6% and 9.1% for orchitis/urinary tract infections, and 0.6% and 4.8% for prostatic abscess formation. Regarding sexual function, >95% of patients retained their ejaculation while erectile function was maintained or improved. Conclusion: TPLA of the prostate is an innovative, minimally invasive technique for managing patients with BPH. Existing studies indicate an effective technique in reducing International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores, post-void residual reduction, and increase in Qmax, albeit the measured improvements in terms of Qmax are not equal to transurethral resection of the prostate. Although sexual function is maintained, the mean catheterization time is 7 days, and no long-term data are available for most patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.