Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745024›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Immune persistence of an inactivated poliovirus vaccine derived from the Sabin strain: a 10-year follow-up of a phase 3 study.

Lei Ma, Zhifang Ying, Wei Cai, Jianfeng Wang, Jian Zhou, Huijuan Yang, Jingxia Gao, Zhimei Zhao, Jing Liu, Shengjie Ouyang and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01510366 (The Phase Ⅲ Clinical Trial Protocol for the Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Made From Sabin Strains), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01510366 phase3completednot on this map

The Phase Ⅲ Clinical Trial Protocol for the Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Made From Sabin Strains

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2012 to 2015Enrolled1,200ConditionsPoliomyelitisArmsInactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine (Sabin strains), Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine (Salk strains)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lei MaInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Zhifang YingNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Wei CaiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jianfeng WangNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Jian ZhouInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Huijuan YangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jingxia GaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Zhimei ZhaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jing LiuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Shengjie OuyangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Shaohui SongInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Fei ShenInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Ruirui ZhaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Lilan XuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Xiaohu DaiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Yanan WuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Weidong LiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.
Changgui LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Guoyang LiaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In a previous phase 3 clinical trial, we showed that an inactivated poliovirus vaccine derived from the Sabin strain (sIPV) can induce neutralising antibodies against currently circulating and reference wild poliovirus strains. However, the immune persistence of sIPV remains to be evaluated. Methods: In this study, 400 participants who were eligible for an early phase 3 clinical trial (Jan 1, 2012-Aug 31, 2014) in Pingle County, GuanXi Province, China, were initially involved in one site. Of the participants in the previous phase 3 clinical trial, sera of 287, 262, 237, and 207 participants were sampled at the ages of 4, 6, 8, and 10 years, respectively, after the prime-boost regimen. Neutralising antibodies against attenuated Sabin strains were detected using these serum samples to determine immune persistence. The serum neutralising antibodies titre of 1:8 against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 is considered to be a seroprotection level for polio. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01510366. Findings: The protective rates against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 in the sIPV group were all 100% at 10 years after the booster immunisation, compared with 98.1%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively, in the wIPV control group after 10 years. After the booster at 18 months, the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 in the sIPV group were 13,265.6, 7856.7, and 6432.2, respectively, and the GMTs in the control group (inoculated with inactivated poliovirus vaccine derived from wild strain (wIPV)) were 3915.6, 2842.6, and 4982.7, respectively. With increasing time after booster immunisation, the GMTs of neutralising antibodies against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 gradually decreased in both the sIPV and wIPV groups. At the age of ten years, the GMTs of neutralising antibodies against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 in the sIPV group were 452.3, 392.8, and 347.5, respectively, and the GMTs in the wIPV group 108.5, 154.8, and 229.3, respectively, which were still at a higher-than-protective level (1:8). Interpretation: Both sIPV and wIPV maintained sufficiently high immune persistence against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 for at least 10 years after booster immunisation. Funding: Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the National High-tech Research and Development Program, the National International Science and Technology Cooperation Project, the Yunnan Application Basic Research Project, the Innovation Team Project of Xie He, the Yunnan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project, and the Medical and Technology Innovation Project of Xie He.

Indexed as

Immune persistenceInactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)IPV derived from the Sabin strain (sIPV)IPV produced using wild poliovirus seed strains (wIPV)

Identifiers

PMID37745024
PMCPMC10514427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.