Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744999›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

An improved framework for detecting discrete epidemiologically meaningful partitions in hierarchically clustered genetic data.

David K Jacobson, Ross Low, Mateusz M Plucinski, Joel L N Barratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic characterization ofLancet regional health. Americas · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel insights on the genetic population structure of human-infectingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David K JacobsonDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, United States.
Ross LowDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, United States.
Mateusz M PlucinskiDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, United States.
Joel L N BarrattDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-2408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Hierarchical clustering of microbial genotypes has the limitation that hierarchical clusters are nested, where smaller groups of related isolates exist within larger groups that get progressively larger as relationships become increasingly distant. In an epidemiologic context, investigators must dissect hierarchical trees into discrete groupings that are epidemiologically meaningful. We recently described a statistical framework (Method A) for dissecting hierarchical trees that attempts to minimize investigator bias. Here, we apply a modified version of that framework (Method B) to a hierarchical tree constructed from 2111 genotypes of the foodborne parasite Results: Compared to the other methods, Method B, TreeCluster, and PARNAS were the most accurate (99.4%) in identifying genetic groups that reflected the epidemiologic groupings, noting that TreeCluster and PARNAS performed identically on our dataset. CutreeHybrid identified groups reflecting patterns in the wider Availability and implementation: Relevant code and data are publicly available. Source code (Method B) and instructions for its use are available here: https://github.com/Joel-Barratt/Hierarchical-tree-dissection-framework.

Identifiers

PMID37744999
PMCPMC10517639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.