ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2023
A 14-year-old boy with severe erythema multiforme due to amoxicillin.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most common cause of erythema multiforme (EM) in children is infectious diseases which account for approximately 90% of cases. Drug eruptions are another common cause. Here we are reporting about a male patient aged 14 years with lymphadenitis who developed severe diffuse erythema during the course of treatment with medications including several antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Based on the pathological findings of the skin biopsy, the skin rash was due to EM. Upon investigating the underlying cause of EM, viral antibody was positive for Coxsackie A6, lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) was positive for one of the NSAIDs, and the patch test (PT) was positive for amoxicillin. Based on the pattern of distribution of the skin rash, the cause of EM was considered to be drug-induced eruption due to amoxicillin. In this case, we did not derive a diagnosis of drug eruption without investigating the possibility of drug induction, because most cases of EM in children are induced by infection and the antibody against Coxsackie A6 was elevated. To diagnose the possibility of amoxicillin-induced EM, it was important to distinguish between the distribution patterns of infectious versus drug-induced EM and to evaluate the possibility of drug induction by both LTT and PT. If the diagnosis of amoxicillin-induced EM, had not been made, the potential recurrence of EM with amoxicillin could have occurred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.