Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744770›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Novel Validated Five-point Photonumeric Scales for Assessment of Static and Dynamic Forehead Lines.

Tingsong Lim, Martina Kerscher, Alexandra Ogilvie, Tatjana Pavicic, Paul Z Lorenc, Konstantin Frank, Valentina Prinz, Mia Cajkovsky, Rainer Pooth, Claudia Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tingsong LimFrom the Clique Clinic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Martina KerscherDivision of Cosmetic Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexandra OgilvieSkinConcept, Munich, Germany.
Tatjana PavicicPrivate Practice for Dermatology and Aesthetics, Munich, Germany.
Paul Z LorencDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, N.Y.
Konstantin FrankOcean Clinic, Marbella, Spain.
Valentina PrinzYuvell, Aesthetic Clinic & Clinical Trial Center, Vienna, Austria.
Mia CajkovskyYuvell, Aesthetic Clinic & Clinical Trial Center, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer PoothClinical Research and Development, ICA Aesthetic Navigation GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Claudia HernandezCH Dermatologia, Medellin, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this investigation was to create and validate five-point photonumeric scales which assess static and dynamic forehead lines. Methods: Two different novel five-point photonumeric scales for the assessment of static and dynamic forehead lines were developed. Moreover, a photoguide was created, including subjects from both sexes, all age groups, and different Fitzpatrick skin types. A total of 11 raters from all over the world were involved in the digital validation, whereas four raters performed a live validation. Results: The Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in both the digital and the live setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.89] in the first digital rating and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.78-0.86] in the second digital rating. The Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in the digital setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83 [95% CI: 0.79-0.86] in the first digital rating and 0.80 [95% CI: 0.75-0.84] in the second rating and almost substantial agreement in the live setting. Conclusions: The Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale and the Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale have excellent inter and intra-rater agreements to be justifiably used in the clinical and study setting, both digitally and live across ethnic groups.

Identifiers

PMID37744770
PMCPMC10513138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.