Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744740›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Evidence from a Smoking Management Service in a University Teaching Hospital in Dublin, Ireland monitored by repeat surveys, 1997-2022.

Ana Mattson, Kirsten Doherty, Ailsa Lyons, Alexander Douglass, Mary Kerley, Sinead Stynes, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Cecily Kelleher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana MattsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Kirsten DohertyDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Ailsa LyonsDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Alexander DouglassUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary KerleyDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Sinead StynesDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia FitzpatrickDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Cecily KelleherDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Health Promotion, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

St Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH) has a comprehensive smoking management programme and since 1997 has conducted periodic surveys of inpatients, outpatients, staff and visitors to establish prevalence of smoking and associated attitudes towards the hospital's smoke-free campus policy pioneered in 2009. We report trends and describe also the online community stop smoking course (SSC) developed more recently in response to COVID-19. A questionnaire examining attitudes and smoking status was administered by census surveys of inpatients, quota or random sub-sample surveys of staff, and quota surveys with outpatients and visitors in the time period of 1997-2018. Chi square test for trend was used. Smoking rates declined in all groups but significantly so in outpatients (19.5% vs. 10%; p < 0.01), visitors (27.4% vs. 9.5%; p < 0.0001) and staff (30.0% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.0001). Use of E-Cigarettes was low in all cohorts. Rates of smoking were borderline higher in inpatients eligible by income for state-funded General Medical Services (33.2% vs 26.8%, p = 0.099). Support for and awareness of the ban increased over time. Demographic and quit data was compared between participants of in-person or online SSC. The online courses were successful with a maintenance of quit rates (End of Course: 54.7% vs. 55.0%, 1 Month: 50.4% vs. 54.0%, 3 Month: 19.8% vs. 22.5%). While the hospital community's smoking prevalence has decreased over time and attitudes to the smoking ban have been increasingly positive, the campus is not without difficulties in keeping it smoke-free. We continue to advocate for hospital staff support in enacting this flagship initiative.

Indexed as

AttitudesCampus smoking banCOVID-19 trendsSmoking cessationSmoking prevalence

Identifiers

PMID37744740
PMCPMC10511793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.