Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744723›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2023

Expanding horizons and navigating challenges for enhanced clinical workflows: ChatGPT in urology.

Ali Talyshinskii, Nithesh Naik, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly, Gafur Khairli, Bakhman Guliev, Patrick Juilebø-Jones, Lazaros Tzelves, Bhaskar Kumar Somani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali TalyshinskiiDepartment of Urology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Nithesh NaikDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
B M Zeeshan HameedDepartment of Urology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, India.
Ulanbek ZhanbyrbekulyDepartment of Urology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Gafur KhairliDepartment of Urology, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Bakhman GulievDepartment of Urology, Mariinsky Hospital, St Petersburg, Russia.
Patrick Juilebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lazaros TzelvesDepartment of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleion Hospital, Athens, Marousi, Greece.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review: ChatGPT has emerged as a potential tool for facilitating doctors' workflows. However, when it comes to applying these findings within a urological context, there have not been many studies. Thus, our objective was rooted in analyzing the pros and cons of ChatGPT use and how it can be exploited and used by urologists. Recent findings: ChatGPT can facilitate clinical documentation and note-taking, patient communication and support, medical education, and research. In urology, it was proven that ChatGPT has the potential as a virtual healthcare aide for benign prostatic hyperplasia, an educational and prevention tool on prostate cancer, educational support for urological residents, and as an assistant in writing urological papers and academic work. However, several concerns about its exploitation are presented, such as lack of web crawling, risk of accidental plagiarism, and concerns about patients-data privacy. Summary: The existing limitations mediate the need for further improvement of ChatGPT, such as ensuring the privacy of patient data and expanding the learning dataset to include medical databases, and developing guidance on its appropriate use. Urologists can also help by conducting studies to determine the effectiveness of ChatGPT in urology in clinical scenarios and nosologies other than those previously listed.

Indexed as

chatGPTgenerative AIhealthcareurologyworkflow

Identifiers

PMID37744723
PMCPMC10512827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.