Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744689›Full record

ReviewJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2023

Evolution of Transdermal Drug Delivery Devices and Novel Microneedle Technologies: A Historical Perspective and Review.

Naveen Joshi, Sina Azizi Machekposhti, Roger J Narayan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naveen JoshiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Sina Azizi MachekposhtiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Roger J NarayanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The history of transdermal drug delivery is as old as humankind. Transdermal drug delivery has undergone three generations of development; the third generation has involved the use of medical devices and instruments. This review provides a historical perspective on the primary approaches employed in the three generations of transdermal drug delivery. In addition, we explore some of the recently developed transdermal techniques that are deemed promising in the field of drug delivery. We discuss how advances in these techniques have led to the development of devices for the delivery of a therapeutically effective amount of drug across human skin and highlight the limitations of the first- and second-generation drug delivery tools. As such, a review of the performance of these techniques and the toxicity of the devices used in transdermal drug delivery are considered. In the last section of the review, a discussion of the fabrication and operation of different types of microneedles is presented. The applications of microneedles in the sensing and delivery of various therapeutic agents are described in detail. Furthermore, an overview of the efficacy of microneedles as emerging tools for the controlled release of drugs is presented.

Identifiers

PMID37744689
PMCPMC10514214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.