Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744683›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2023

Digital twin for healthcare systems.

Alexandre Vallée

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Digital Twins and Health Care: an Umbrella Review.Journal of medical systems · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of AI in Clinical Trial Design and Scientific Writing.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Digital Twin Technology In Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre ValléeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital twin technology is revolutionizing healthcare systems by leveraging real-time data integration, advanced analytics, and virtual simulations to enhance patient care, enable predictive analytics, optimize clinical operations, and facilitate training and simulation. With the ability to gather and analyze a wealth of patient data from various sources, digital twins can offer personalized treatment plans based on individual characteristics, medical history, and real-time physiological data. Predictive analytics and preventive interventions are made possible by machine learning algorithms, allowing for early detection of health risks and proactive interventions. Digital twins can optimize clinical operations by analyzing workflows and resource allocation, leading to streamlined processes and improved patient care. Moreover, digital twins can provide a safe and realistic environment for healthcare professionals to enhance their skills and practice complex procedures. The implementation of digital twin technology in healthcare has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes, enhance patient safety, and drive innovation in the healthcare industry.

Indexed as

digital healthdigital twinhealthcareinnovationpatientpatient safetyprediction

Identifiers

PMID37744683
PMCPMC10513171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.