Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Equity in digital healthcare - the case of Denmark.

Jeppe Eriksen, Mette Ebbesen, Kristina Tornbjerg Eriksen, Camilla Hjermitslev, Casper Knudsen, Pernille Bertelsen, Christian Nøhr, Ditte Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeppe EriksenDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mette EbbesenDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kristina Tornbjerg EriksenDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Camilla HjermitslevDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Casper KnudsenDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pernille BertelsenDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christian NøhrDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ditte WeberDepartment of Planning, Techno-Anthropology & Participation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As digital healthcare services are expanding in use and purpose in a Danish context so are the functionalities embedded in these, constituting citizens' access to healthcare services and personal health data. In Denmark, the impact of inequalities in digital healthcare remains largely unexplored, making it crucial to pay close attention to this aspect as the digital transformation of the sector progresses. According to the Danish Health Act (2019), the Danish healthcare system is required to ensure easy and equal access to healthcare, high-quality treatment, coherent patient pathways, freedom of choice, easy access to information, transparency, and short waiting times for every citizen. These are focal law-based requirements influenced by the digitalisation of healthcare. Hence, based on insights from a highly digitalised country, in this case, Denmark, this paper aims to initiate a discussion on inequities in digital healthcare, address current challenges, and consider future directions by elaborating on conceptual, ethical, evidence-informed, and methodological issues linked to inequities in digital healthcare. Specifically, this paper discusses why inequities in digital healthcare in a Danish context need increased attention, how health equity is embedded in Danish legislation and how it can be approached from an ethical perspective. The central focus revolves around the essential principles of empowerment, emancipation, and equity, which are being highlighted to emphasise that the digitalisation of healthcare should actively work towards preventing and avoiding the perpetuation of healthcare inequalities. The paper concludes by discussing future directions for ensuring a more sustainable, robust, and equitable digital healthcare system.

Indexed as

Health EquityDelivery of Health CareDenmarkDigital TechnologyHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansTelemedicinedigital healthcareegalitarian justiceempowermentequity in digital healthcareequity in healthcarequintuple aim

Identifiers

PMID37744503
PMCPMC10511744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.