ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Primary ciliary dyskinesia diagnosis and management and its implications in America: a mini review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two Distinct Clinical Presentations of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD): Diagnostic Utility of Whole-Exome Sequencing in a Genetically Heterogeneous Disorder.The application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Sex-Associated Radiographic and Clinical Differences in Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Pulmonary Disease.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of machine learning analysis for the identification of patients with possible primary ciliary dyskinesia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- DNAH10 mutation cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with defects of IDAf complex assembly and lung fibrosis manifestation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy reveals regulatory mechanisms of MYO7A-driven cargo transport in stereocilia of live inner ear hair cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Machine Learning Analysis for the Identification of Patients with Possible Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Limitations of PICADAR as a diagnostic predictive tool for primary ciliary dyskinesia.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Clinical Review.Cells · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder that can result in significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Clinical manifestations of PCD include recurrent respiratory infections, laterality defects, and infertility, all of which arise from impaired or absent ciliary motility. Diagnostic approaches for PCD may include high-speed video microscopy, measurement of nasal nitric oxide levels, and genetic testing; however, no single definitive diagnostic test exists. The present study aims to highlight the lack of standardized diagnostic and treatment guidelines for PCD in Latin America (Central and South America, and the Caribbean). To this effect, we compared North American and European recommendations for the diagnosis and management of PCD and found that certain diagnostic tools and treatment options mentioned in these guidelines are not readily accessible in many Latin American countries. Methods & Results: This review gathers disease information in North America, Europe, and Latin America organizing guideline results into tables for clarity and potential interventions. Management information for Latin America is inferred from case reports, as most findings are from North American recommendations and studies on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Treatment and management information is based on North American and European standards.Among 5,774 publications reviewed, only 15 articles met the inclusion criteria (focused on PCD management, peer-reviewed, and located in America). No clinical guideline for PCD in Latin America was found, but recommendations on respiratory management from Colombia and Chile were discovered. The lack of guidelines in Latin America may originate from limited resources and research on the disease in those countries. Discussion: PCD lacks documentation, research, and recommendations regarding its prevalence in Latin America, likely due to unfavorable economic conditions. This disadvantage results in limited access to diagnostic tests available in North America and Europe. The PICADAR score, discussed in this review, can be used in low-income nations as a screening tool for the disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.