ArticleSurgery open science2023
Outcomes in patients managed with endovascular stent for malignant superior vena cava syndrome.
Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary management of superior vena cava syndrome.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Review
- Article
- Endovascular Stenting for Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Complicated by Interstitial Pneumonia: A Report of 2 Cases.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS) corresponds to the clinical manifestations due to the restriction of venous return to the right atrium secondary to obstruction of the superior vena cava and/or its main tributaries for a tumor. Endovascular management has proven to be safe, effective and cause a fast symptomatic relief in patients with SVCS. There is limited evidence in factors associated with outcomes in malignant setting for this procedure. Materials and methods: An analytical retrospective study was conducted and included patients that underwent endovascular management for malignant SVCS at the National Cancer Institute of Colombia between May 2016 and May 2021. Clinical and technical variables were analyzed to found associations with outcomes in these patients. Results: 54 patients were analyzed. Successful procedure rate was 94.4 %. At 10 months, the OS of the entire cohort of patients was 25 %. Patients with breast or lung cancer ( Conclusions: Based in the high success rate of the endovascular management and the better outcome in patients with early and successful procedure, this procedure should be considered as part of the multimodal treatment in patients with SVCS independent of the clinical scenario and the oncological diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.