Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744253›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Surface modification of Polyether-ether-ketone for enhanced cell response: a chemical etching approach.

Rupak Dua, Onessa Sharufa, Joi Terry, William Dunn, Indu Khurana, Jagasivamani Vadivel, Yue Zhang, Henry J Donahue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rupak DuaAmerican Dental Association Science and Research Institute (ADASRI), Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
Onessa SharufaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, United States.
Joi TerryDepartment of Biology, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, United States.
William DunnThe New Horizons Governor's School for Science and Technology, Hampton, VA, United States.
Indu KhuranaDepartment of Economics and Business, Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden-Sydney, VA, United States.
Jagasivamani VadivelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, United States.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Henry J DonahueDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Hampton University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USAmerican Dental Association · USHampden–Sydney College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is increasingly becoming popular in medicine because of its excellent mechanical strength, dimensional stability, and chemical resistance properties. However, PEEK being bioinert, has weak bone osseointegration properties, limiting its clinical applications. In this study, a porous PEEK structure was developed using a chemical etching method with 98 wt% sulfuric acids and three post-treatments were performed to improve bone cell adhesion and proliferation. Four groups of PEEK samples were prepared for the study: Control (untreated; Group 1); Etched with sulfuric acid and washed with distilled water (Group 2); Etched with sulfuric acid and washed with acetone and distilled water (Group 3); and Etched with sulfuric acid and washed with 4 wt% sodium hydroxide and distilled water (Group 4). Surface characterization of the different groups was evaluated for surface topology, porosity, roughness, and wettability using various techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, profilometer, and goniometer. Further chemical characterization was done using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to analyze the elements on the surface of each group. Bone cell studies were conducted using cell toxicity and alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) assays. The SEM analysis of the different groups revealed porous structures in the treatment groups, while the control group showed a flat topology. There was no statistically significant difference between the pore size within the treated groups. This was further confirmed by the roughness values measured with the profilometer. We found a statistically significant increase in the roughness from 7.22 × 10

Indexed as

biomaterialschemical etchingdental implantorthopedic implantPEEK-Polyether-ether-ketone

Identifiers

PMID37744253
PMCPMC10517429
OpenAlexW4386520405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.