Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744220›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Performance of multigene testing in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules and molecular risk stratification.

Yuanyuan Zhou, Xinping Wu, Yuzhi Zhang, Zhiqiang Li, Xia Ge, Hao Chen, Yuan Mao, Wenbo Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Implications and Application of Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules in the Chinese Population.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanyuan ZhouGenome Center, KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xinping WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Third Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yuzhi ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Third Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhiqiang LiGenome Center, KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xia GeDepartment of Pathological Diagnosis, KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Hao ChenGenome Center, KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Yuan MaoGenome Center, KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Wenbo DingDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Third Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid cancer is the third most prevalent cancer among females. Genetic testing based on next-generation sequencing may provide an auxiliary diagnosis to reduce cytologically diagnostic uncertainty. However, commercial multigene tests are not widely available and are not well-tested in the Chinese population. Methods: In this study, we designed a multigene testing panel and evaluated its performance in 529 cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III, IV and V). The molecular data of the DNA mutations and RNA fusions of fine needle aspiration samples were reviewed in conjunction with a clinical diagnosis, pathological reports, and definitive surgery for retrospective analysis. Then, the molecular risk stratification was investigated for its accuracy in malignant risk prediction. Results: The overall combined consistency revealed substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.726) with the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 97.80%, 82.14%, 98.99%, and 67.65%, respectively. The most common aberration was Conclusions: This study provided a multigene panel for identifying benign nodules from cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to avoid unnecessary surgery. We provide further evidence for using molecular risk stratification as a promising predictor of disease outcomes. The results of this study may be limited by the extremely high prevalence of cancer in the cohort for clinical reference.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleFemaleHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafIndeterminate cytologyMolecular risk stratificationMolecular testingNext-generation sequencingThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID37744220
PMCPMC10512961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.