ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2023
PROClass: The Development and Validation of a Novel Prosthetic Component Sophistication Classification System.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Effect of Prosthetic Limb Sophistication and Amputation Level on Self-reported Mobility and Satisfaction With Mobility.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- AMPREDICT PROsthetics-Predicting Prosthesis Mobility to Aid in Prosthetic Prescription and Rehabilitation Planning.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a lower limb prosthesis (LLP) sophistication classification system that categorizes prosthetic component prescriptions into "basic," "intermediate," and "advanced" and assess its content validity, reliability, and accuracy. Design: Classification development and validation study. Setting: The Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse database and National Prosthetics Patient Database were used to identify patients undergoing their first amputation at the transtibial or transfemoral level due to diabetes or peripheral artery disease and to identify the associated codes for each LLP. Participants: An expert panel of 6 nationally recognized certified prosthetists, a national expert in VA prosthetics data and coding, a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician, and an epidemiologist developed an LLP classification system ( Main Outcome Measures: The expert panel reviewed 20 consecutive participants meeting study criteria for the development of the Results: The interrater and intrarater reliability was almost perfect with Gwet's AC1 values ranging from .82 to .96 for both expert panel members and research assistants. The accuracy of the research assistant's classifications to the "criterion standard" was excellent with Gwet's AC1 values ranging between .75 and .92. Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.