ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2023
Effectiveness of the "Evidence-Based Scientific Exercise Guidelines" in Increasing Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Cardiometabolic Health, and Muscle Strength in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact and feasibility of a group-based therapeutic exercise program on strength and endurance in hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury: a quasi-experimental study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of exercise and physical activity interventions that meet current guideline recommendations on cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiometabolic health, and muscle strength in adults in the acute stage (<1 year post onset) of spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Data Sources: Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Google Scholar, National Institute Clinical Excellence, World Health Organization) were searched (January 2016-March 2022) to extend a previously published review. Study Selection: Included studies implemented exercise interventions in the acute stage of SCI rehabilitation participants which met the exercise guidelines and measured cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiometabolic health, and strength outcomes. Data Extraction: Titles and abstracts were screened against eligibility criteria and duplicates removed using EndNote X8. Full texts were independently assessed and results presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart. Data extraction was completed on included studies by 2 reviewers (L.R. and V.B.) using a modified Cochrane Group form. Data Synthesis: Data were synthesized, appraised using the Modified Downs & Black checklist and presented in narrative and tabular format. This review was registered on PROSPERO (Register ID:CRD42021249441). Of the 1255 studies, 4 were included, featuring 108 total participants <1-year post-SCI. Functional electrical stimulation cycle ergometry reduced muscle atrophy after 3 months training and increased lean body mass after 6 months. Resistance training increased muscle peak torque, perceived muscle strength and function. Aerobic exercise interventions did not increase cardiorespiratory fitness. Conclusions: Interventions meeting the exercise guidelines did not increase cardiorespiratory fitness but were shown to improve cardiometabolic health and perceived muscle strength and function in adults in the acute stage of SCI rehabilitation. Further empirical research using standardized outcome measures are required to explore the effectiveness of aerobic exercise and strengthening interventions in acute stage of SCI rehabilitation to support the development of exercise guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.