Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744167›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

How do resource distribution and taxonomy affect the use of dual foraging in seabirds? A review.

Jessica A Phillips, Tim Guilford, Annette L Fayet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The influence of rivers on seabird foraging ecology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. How do resource distribution and taxonomy affect the use of dual foraging in seabirds? A review.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  4. Plan ahead, or wing it? How storm-petrel parents adjust food delivery to young chicks.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica A PhillipsDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1373-3791
Tim GuilfordDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Annette L FayetDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-0500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many seabird species, parents feeding young switch between short and long foraging excursions in a strategy known as "dual foraging." To investigate whether habitat quality near breeding colonies drives the use of dual foraging, we conducted a review of the seabird literature, compiling the results of 102 studies which identified dual-foraging in 50 species across nine families from all six seabird orders. We estimated the mean distance from the colony of each species' short and long foraging trips and obtained remote-sensed data on chlorophyll-a concentrations within the radius of both short and long trips around each colony. We then assessed, for each seabird family, the relationship between the use of dual foraging strategies and the difference in the quality of foraging locations between short- and long-distance foraging trips. We found that the probability of dual foraging grew with increasing differences in the quality of foraging locations available during short- and long-distance trips. We also found that when controlling for differences in habitat quality, albatrosses and penguins were less likely to use dual foraging than Procellariidae, which in turn were less likely to use dual foraging than Sulids. This study helps clarify how environmental conditions and taxon-specific characteristics influence seabird foraging behavior.

Indexed as

central-place foragingdual foraginghabitat qualityinterspecific differencesparent–offspring conflictseabirds

Identifiers

PMID37744167
PMCPMC10516677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.