Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744071›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2023

Reduction in transfer of micro-organisms between patients and staff using short-sleeved gowns and hand/arm hygiene in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A simulation-based randomised trial.

Laura Vincent, Mudathir Ibrahim, Joanne Kitchin, Claire Pickering, Jennie Wilson, Enrico Sorrentino, Claudia Salvagno, Laurie Earl, Louise Ma, Kathryn Simpson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura VincentAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-4734
Mudathir IbrahimNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-1533
Joanne KitchinNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claire PickeringAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Jennie WilsonRichard Wells research centre, University of West London, Brentford, UK.
Enrico SorrentinoAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Claudia SalvagnoAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Laurie EarlNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9979-4637
Louise MaWhittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kathryn SimpsonWhittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rose BakerSchool of Business, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Peter McCullochAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current personal protective equipment (PPE) practices in UK intensive care units involve "sessional" use of long-sleeved gowns, risking nosocomial infection transmitted via gown sleeves. Data from the first wave of the COVID19 pandemic demonstrated that these changes in infection prevention and control protocols were associated with an increase in healthcare associated bloodstream infections. We therefore explored the use of a protocol using short-sleeved gowns with hand and arm hygiene to reduce this risk. Methods: ICU staff were trained in wearing short-sleeved gowns and using a specific hand and arm washing technique between patients (experimental protocol). They then underwent simulation training, performing COVID-19 intubation and proning tasks using either experimental protocol or the standard (long-sleeved) control protocol. Fluorescent powder was used to simulate microbial contamination, detected using photographs under ultraviolet light. Teams were randomised to use control or experimental PPE first. During the simulation, staff were questioned on their feelings about personal safety, comfort and patient safety. Results: Sixty-eight staff and 17 proning volunteers were studied. Experimental PPE completely prevented staff contamination during COVID-19 intubation, whereas this occurred in 30/67 staff wearing control PPE ( Conclusions: Short-sleeved gowns with hand and forearm cleansing appear superior to sessional long-sleeved gowns in preventing cross-contamination between staff and patients.

Indexed as

COVID19infection controlintensive carepersonal protective equipmentsimulation

Identifiers

PMID37744071
PMCPMC10515327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.