ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023
Best practice guidelines for citizen science in mental health research: systematic review and evidence synthesis.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deliberation as a condition for meaningful participation in health and healthcare research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- How researchers refer to individuals with schizophrenia: person-first and identity-first language in academic papers.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Living with mental health issues: citizen science project on self-management strategies.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
- How can citizen science enhance mental health research quality: theory of change development.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Hair salons as a promising space to provide HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for young women in Lesotho: a citizen scientist mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Enhancing hospital protection measures reduces frontline medical workers' stress during the pandemic.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Giving children a voice: Concept development and foundation of the first Children's council "mental health" in Germany.JCPP advances · 2024Article
- Applying Digital Technology to Understand Human Experiences of Climate Change Impacts on Food Security and Mental Health: Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- DiScO: novel rapid systems mapping to inform digital transformation of health systems.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partnering with people most affected by mental health problems can transform mental health outcomes. Citizen science as a research approach enables partnering with the public at a substantial scale, but there is scarce guidance on its use in mental health research. To develop best practise guidelines for conducting and reporting research, we conducted a systematic review of studies reporting mental health citizen science research. Documents were identified from electronic databases (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.