ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023
Analysis of cellularity in H&E-stained rat bone marrow tissue via deep learning.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional profiling of porcine precision-cut lymph node slices as anFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective was to develop an automated deep-learning-based method to evaluate cellularity in rat bone marrow hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images for preclinical safety assessment. We trained a shallow CNN for segmenting marrow, 2 Mask R-CNN models for segmenting megakaryocytes (MKCs), and small hematopoietic cells (SHCs), and a SegNet model for segmenting red blood cells. We incorporated the models into a pipeline that identifies and counts MKCs and SHCs in rat bone marrow. We compared cell segmentation and counts that our method generated to those that pathologists generated on 10 slides with a range of cell depletion levels from 10 studies. For SHCs, we compared cell counts that our method generated to counts generated by Cellpose and Stardist. The median Dice and object Dice scores for MKCs using our method vs pathologist consensus and the inter- and intra-pathologist variation were comparable, with overlapping first-third quartile ranges. For SHCs, the median scores were close, with first-third quartile ranges partially overlapping intra-pathologist variation. For SHCs, in comparison to Cellpose and Stardist, counts from our method were closer to pathologist counts, with a smaller 95% limits of agreement range. The performance of the bone marrow analysis pipeline supports its incorporation into routine use as an aid for hematotoxicity assessment by pathologists. The pipeline could help expedite hematotoxicity assessment in preclinical studies and consequently could expedite drug development. The method may enable meta-analysis of rat bone marrow characteristics from future and historical whole slide images and may generate new biological insights from cross-study comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.