Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37743975›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Analysis of cellularity in H&E-stained rat bone marrow tissue via deep learning.

Smadar Shiffman, Edgar A Rios Piedra, Adeyemi O Adedeji, Catherine F Ruff, Rachel N Andrews, Paula Katavolos, Evan Liu, Ashley Forster, Jochen Brumm, Reina N Fuji and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Smadar ShiffmanGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Edgar A Rios PiedraGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Adeyemi O AdedejiGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Catherine F RuffGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Rachel N AndrewsGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Paula KatavolosGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Evan LiuGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Development Sciences Informatics, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, USA.
Ashley ForsterGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Jochen BrummGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Nonclinical Biostatistics, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, USA.
Reina N FujiGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.
Ruth SullivanGenentech Research and Early Development (gRED), Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to develop an automated deep-learning-based method to evaluate cellularity in rat bone marrow hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images for preclinical safety assessment. We trained a shallow CNN for segmenting marrow, 2 Mask R-CNN models for segmenting megakaryocytes (MKCs), and small hematopoietic cells (SHCs), and a SegNet model for segmenting red blood cells. We incorporated the models into a pipeline that identifies and counts MKCs and SHCs in rat bone marrow. We compared cell segmentation and counts that our method generated to those that pathologists generated on 10 slides with a range of cell depletion levels from 10 studies. For SHCs, we compared cell counts that our method generated to counts generated by Cellpose and Stardist. The median Dice and object Dice scores for MKCs using our method vs pathologist consensus and the inter- and intra-pathologist variation were comparable, with overlapping first-third quartile ranges. For SHCs, the median scores were close, with first-third quartile ranges partially overlapping intra-pathologist variation. For SHCs, in comparison to Cellpose and Stardist, counts from our method were closer to pathologist counts, with a smaller 95% limits of agreement range. The performance of the bone marrow analysis pipeline supports its incorporation into routine use as an aid for hematotoxicity assessment by pathologists. The pipeline could help expedite hematotoxicity assessment in preclinical studies and consequently could expedite drug development. The method may enable meta-analysis of rat bone marrow characteristics from future and historical whole slide images and may generate new biological insights from cross-study comparisons.

Indexed as

Cell quantificationDeep learningDigital pathologyH&E rat bone marrow

Identifiers

PMID37743975
PMCPMC10514468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.