ArticleEplasty2023
Use of a Novel Adhesive Suture Retention Device in Non-traumatic Diabetic Lower Extremity Amputations: A Multicenter Case Review.
Article in Eplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amputations in the diabetic foot are commonly associated with complications, including delayed wound healing, surgical site dehiscence, and the need for additional amputations. Use of a novel adhesive suture retention device (ASRD) has been previously shown to support improved linear closure outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective case review was to determine if the adoption of the ASRD in 5 podiatric surgical practices would reduce postoperative complications in patients with diabetes undergoing foot amputations including surgical site dehiscence and the need for additional amputation. Methods: A 5-center retrospective chart review was performed to assess the difference in postoperative surgical site dehiscence and reamputation rates for patients with diabetes undergoing minor and major lower extremity amputations before and after adopting the use of the ARSD. Results: Adoption of the adhesive retention suture device was associated with an overall decrease in wound dehiscence of 81% ( Conclusions: Utilization of the ARSD decreased the incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence and reamputation in this patient cohort, thus lessening patient morbidity and decreasing the overall cost of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37743966PMC10517667W4387003256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.