Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37743560›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2024

[Obstacles and practical perspectives of the consultation in general medicine of migrants with psychological disorders. Qualitative study among French general practitioners].

Marie Lerigoleur, Aurélie Urena-Dores, Bourrel Gérard, Cyril Jaume, Mathilde Minet, Élodie Million, Bernard Clary, Agnès Oude Engberink, Béatrice Lognos Folco

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie LerigoleurUniversity of Montpellier Faculty of Medicine Montpellier-Nimes, Montpellier, France.
Aurélie Urena-DoresUniversity of Montpellier Faculty of Medicine Montpellier-Nimes, Montpellier, France.
Bourrel GérardINSERM-Université de Montpellier IDESP, Montpellier, France.
Cyril JaumeMédecins du Monde, Montpellier, France.
Mathilde MinetUniversity of Montpellier Faculty of Medicine Montpellier-Nimes, Montpellier, France.
Élodie MillionINSERM-Université de Montpellier IDESP, Montpellier, France.
Bernard ClaryUniversity of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Agnès Oude EngberinkINSERM-Université de Montpellier IDESP, Montpellier, France.
Béatrice Lognos FolcoINSERM-Université de Montpellier IDESP, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-3167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to understand the problems of managing psychological disorders in migrant populations, based on the experience of general practitioners.

methodA qualitative study was carried out with general practitioners interviewed in a semi-directive mode. We chose the continuous comparison method and Peirce's pragmatic phenomenological approach to explore the lived experience.

resultsThirteen interviews revealed four phenomenological categories: (1) Immigration was an experience of mental suffering from beginning to end at the source of psychological disorder migrant population (PDMPs) with the need for specialized follow-up. (2) Inadequate support on arrival, with complicated administrative procedures and insecure societal and environmental conditions, exacerbated the precariousness of migrants, making follow-up difficult. (3) Immigration was a transcultural journey in which the language, attitudes and perceptions of each individual blurred understanding of symptoms and care, and thus professional communication. (4) Unprepared general practitioners found counselling migrants to be difficult, time-consuming and complex. They pointed to the need for a coordinated system with comprehensive multidisciplinary care.Data saturation was reached. Three researchers were brought together.

conclusionThis study highlights the difficulties encountered by general practitioner (GPs) dealing with migrant patients in France. They feel helpless in the face of the nature of the disorders encountered and experience a disparity between the connections that are difficult to establish and those in their usual practice, even when professional experience with this population is acquired. They point to the need for coordinated models of care, financed by public policy.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMental DisordersTransients and MigrantsHumansLanguageQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationhealthcare policyimmigrant mental healthphenomenologyposttraumatic stress disorderprimary carequalitativetranscultural

Identifiers

PMID37743560
PMCPMC10874601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.