ArticleScientific reports2023
Prediction of surface roughness based on fused features and ISSA-DBN in milling of die steel P20.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Surface Roughness in Turning Complex-Structured Workpieces Using Vibration-Signal-Based Gaussian Process Regression.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The roughness of the part surface is one of the most crucial standards for evaluating machining quality due to its relationship with service performance. For a preferable comprehension of the evolution of surface roughness, this study proposes a novel surface roughness prediction model on the basis of the unity of fuse d signal features and deep learning architecture. The force and vibration signals produced in the milling of P20 die steel are collected, and time and frequency domain feature from the acquired signals are extracted by variational modal decomposition. The GA-MI algorithm is taken to select the signal features that are relevant to the surface roughness of the workpiece. The optimal feature subset is analyzed and used as the input of the prediction model. DBN is adopted to estimate the surface roughness and the model parameters are optimized by ISSA. (Reviewer 1, Q1) The separate force, vibration and fusion signal information are brought into the DBN model and the ISSA-DBN model for the prediction of surface roughness, and the results show that the accuracy of the roughness prediction is as follows, respectively DBN: 78.1%, 68.8% and 84.4%, and ISSA-DBN: 93.8%, 87.5% and 100%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.