Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37742454›Full record

ArticleVision research2023

Informational feedback accelerates learning in multi-alternative perceptual judgements of orientation.

Jiajuan Liu, Zhong-Lin Lu, Barbara Dosher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiajuan LiuCognitive Sciences Department, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA. Electronic address: jiajuanl@uci.edu.
Zhong-Lin LuDivision of Arts and Sciences, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China; Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA; NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, Shanghai, China.
Barbara DosherCognitive Sciences Department, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA. Electronic address: bdosher@uci.edu.

Funding

The Functions and Mechanisms of Perceptual LearningR01EY017491 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DOSHER, BARBARA A., LU, ZHONG-LIN · 2006 to 2023
$6.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience or training can substantially improve perceptual performance through perceptual learning, and the extent and rate of these improvements may be affected by feedback. In this paper, we first developed a neural network model based on the integrated reweighting theory (Dosher et al., 2013) to account for perceptual learning and performance in n-alternative identification tasks and the dependence of learning on different forms of feedback. We then report an experiment comparing the effectiveness of response feedback (RF) versus accuracy feedback (AF) or no feedback (NF) (full versus partial versus no supervision) in learning a challenging eight-alternative visual orientation identification (8AFC) task. Although learning sometimes occurred in the absence of feedback (NF), RF had a clear advantage above AF or NF in this task. Using hybrid supervision learning rules, a new n-alternative identification integrated reweighting theory (I-IRT) explained both the differences in learning curves given different feedback and the dynamic changes in identification confusion data. This study shows that training with more informational feedback (RF) is more effective, though not necessary, in these challenging n-alternative tasks, a result that has implications for developing training paradigms in realistic tasks.

Indexed as

JudgmentVisual PerceptionFeedbackHumansLearningOrientation

Identifiers

PMID37742454
PMCPMC12419673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.