Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37741909›Full record

ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2023

Co-design and Development of Implementation Strategies: Enhancing the PAX Good Behaviour Game in Australian Schools.

Rachel Baffsky, Rebecca Ivers, Patricia Cullen, Lauren McGillivray, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Alison L Calear, Philip J Batterham, John W Toumbourou, Rhoni Stokes, Pauline Kotselas and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel BaffskySchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia. r.baffsky@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-0617
Rebecca IversSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Patricia CullenSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Samuels Building, F25, Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Lauren McGillivrayBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Aliza Werner-SeidlerBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
John W ToumbourouSchool of Psychology and Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development (SEED), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Rhoni StokesDepartment of Education, New South Wales (NSW), Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Pauline KotselasDepartment of Education, New South Wales (NSW), Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Traci PrendergastDepartment of Education, New South Wales (NSW), Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Black Dog Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AUAustralian National University · AUDeakin University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1122544National Health and Medical Research Council 1134894National Health and Medical Research Council 1136430National Health and Medical Research Council 1138710National Health and Medical Research Council 1158223National Health and Medical Research Council 1158707National Health and Medical Research Council 1173146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective implementation strategies are important for take-up of programs in schools. However, to date, few implementation strategies have been co-designed with teachers and support staff (including principals) in Australia. The aim of this study was to iteratively co-design multiple implementation strategies to enhance the delivery of mental health prevention program, PAX Good Behaviour Game, in New South Wales primary schools. The secondary aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the implementation strategies from the perspective of school staff. Twenty-nine educational staff (including principals) informed the co-design of the implementation strategies across three phases. Phase 1 involved a rapid review of the literature and stakeholder meetings to agree upon potential evidence-based strategies. Phase 2 involved focus group discussions with educational staff to co-design implementation strategies. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews with school staff to assess strategy acceptability after implementation at 6-months post-baseline. Data were analysed using deductive, framework analysis. The final co-designed intervention included nine implementation strategies accessible through a toolkit delivered to the school's leadership team. These strategies were deemed acceptable in school settings that experienced periods of both face-to-face and remote learning due to the changing COVID-19 situation in 2021. This paper contributes to the implementation literature by transparently reporting how educational staff-informed implementation strategies were iteratively co-designed. This will provide a roadmap for other researchers to co-design implementation strategies to further support the delivery of evidence-based prevention programs in schools.

Indexed as

LearningSchoolsAustraliaFocus GroupsHumansNew South WalesCo-designImplementation scienceMental healthSchool-based programsTeachers

Identifiers

PMID37741909
PMCPMC10638156
OpenAlexW4386985917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.