ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep learning for tumor margin identification in electromagnetic imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, a novel method for tumor margin identification in electromagnetic imaging is proposed to optimize the tumor removal surgery. This capability will enable the visualization of the border of the cancerous tissue for the surgeon prior or during the excision surgery. To this end, the border between the normal and tumor parts needs to be identified. Therefore, the images need to be segmented into tumor and normal areas. We propose a deep learning technique which divides the electromagnetic images into two regions: tumor and normal, with high accuracy. We formulate deep learning from a perspective relevant to electromagnetic image reconstruction. A recurrent auto-encoder network architecture (termed here DeepTMI) is presented. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated by segmenting the reconstructed images of an experimental tissue-mimicking phantom. The structure similarity measure (SSIM) and mean-square-error (MSE) average of normalized reconstructed results by the DeepTMI method are about 0.94 and 0.04 respectively, while that average obtained from the conventional backpropagation (BP) method can hardly overcome 0.35 and 0.41 respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.