Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37741188›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2023

"Technically an abortion": Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States.

Alicia J VandeVusse, Jennifer Mueller, Marielle Kirstein, Joe Strong, Laura D Lindberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pregnancy Complications AfterThe western journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia J VandeVusseGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: avandevusse@guttmacher.org.
Jennifer MuellerGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
Marielle KirsteinGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
Joe StrongLondon School of Economics, Department of Social Policy, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Laura D LindbergRutgers School of Public Health, 1 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1010, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.

Funding

Advancing Measurement and Analysis of Sensitive Behaviors in the United StatesR01HD084473 · NICHD · GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE · PI LINDBERG, LAURA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-abortion legislation in the United States exploits misinformation and ignores medical definitions to curtail access to essential healthcare. Little is known about how individuals most likely to need this care define abortion, in general or as distinct from miscarriage, and how this might impact access to, utilization of, and experiences of care. Using mixed-method card sort and vignette data from cognitive interviews (n = 64) and a national online survey (n = 2009), we examined individuals' understandings of pregnancy outcomes including abortion and miscarriage. Our findings show that people hold varying ideas of what constitutes an abortion. Many respondents considered 'intent' when classifying pregnancy outcomes and focused on intervention to distinguish between miscarriages and abortions. Particularly, medical intervention was found as a defining feature of abortion. Lack of knowledge regarding pregnancy experiences and ambiguity surrounding early stages of pregnancy also influenced respondents' understanding of abortion. We find that abortion and miscarriage definitions are socially constructed and multi-layered. Advancing our understanding of abortion and miscarriage definitions improves reproductive health research by elucidating potential areas of confusion that may lead to misreporting of reproductive experiences as well as highlighting ways that blurred definitions may be exploited by abortion opponents.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive HealthUnited StatesAbortionCard sortMiscarriageMixed methodsVignettes

Identifiers

PMID37741188
PMCPMC10552775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.