ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024
The use of ultrasonography as an effective screening tool for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to explore the applicability and validity of ultrasonography for diagnosing chronic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.
methodsPCL thickness was measured at 2 cm proximal to the tibia insertion site. Using the same ultrasonography image, the angle tangent to the PCL from the tibia insertion site was also measured. These data were analyzed by plotting the receiver operating curve (ROC), and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to the optimal cut-off point. Ultrasonography data from the PCLinjured knee were compared with those from the contralateral uninjured knee of the same patient.
resultsTwelve men and six women, with a mean age of 28.8 ± 14.0 years, were included in this study. The mean time from injury to medical examination was 10.0 ± 6.7 months. The mean thickness of the PCL was 8.1 ± 1.9 mm on the affected side and 5.8 ± 1.2 mm on the uninjured side, with the affected side being significantly thicker. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for the thickness of chronic PCL injuries was 6.5 mm (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 77.8%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87). The optimal cut-off value for the angle was 20° (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 94.4%, AUC = 0.96).
conclusionUltrasonography is useful as a screening tool for chronic PCL injuries. The optimal cut-off point was 6.5 mm for thickness and 20° for angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.