Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740786›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

The correlation between osteoporotic vertebrae fracture risk and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lin Chen, Xin-Yi Wu, Qi Jin, Guang-Yao Chen, Xiao Ma

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Asymmetric distribution of vertebral bone microstructure in coronal adult spinal deformity: a cross-sectional study based on quantitative CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conventional chest computed tomography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin Chen *Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9976-6986
Xin-Yi Wu *Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Qi JinGraduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Guang-Yao ChenGraduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Xiao MaPhysical Examination Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100007, People's Republic of China. maxiao@zryhyy.com.cn.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in osteoporosis with vertebral fracture and osteoporosis without fracture. It has been proved that the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by QCT exhibits a stronger correlation with fracture risk than areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured by DXA. PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically evaluate the ability of QCT and DXA to distinguish between osteoporosis with vertebral fracture and osteoporosis without fracture according to vBMD and aBMD.

methodsWe conducted a primary literature search of the online databases up to 3 July, 2022, in both English and Chinese publications, combining synonyms for "QCT", "DXA" and "osteoporosis". The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was employed to evaluate the quality of the selected articles. vBMD obtained through QCT and aBMD obtained through DXA were extracted, and were analyzed by Review Manager 5.4 and RStudio.

resultsSix studies with 610 individuals aged 45 to 90, of which 179 had vertebral fractures, were included in the final analysis. The weighted mean difference (WMD) between osteoporosis with vertebral fracture and osteoporosis without fracture for vBMD was - 27.08 (95% CI  - 31.24 to  - 22.92), while for aBMD was - 0.05 (95% CI - 0.08 to - 0.03).

conclusionsBoth vBMD detected by QCT and aBMD detected by DXA could discriminate fracture status in the spine, and vBMD performed a stronger correlation with fracture risk.

trial registrationPROSPERO 2022 CRD42022349185.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityHumansLumbar VertebraeSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone mineral densityDual energy X-ray absorptiometryFracture riskOsteoporosisQuantitative computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID37740786
OpenAlexW4386980337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.