Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740782›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2023

Virtual 3D femur model to assess femoral version: comparison to the 2D axial slice approach.

Jade Iwasaka-Neder, Sarah D Bixby, M Alejandra Bedoya, Enju Liu, Delma Y Jarrett, Donna Agahigian, Andy Tsai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computed tomography-based automated 3D measurement of femoral version: Validation against standard 2D measurements in symptomatic patients.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jade Iwasaka-NederDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jade.iwasaka-neder@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-0134
Sarah D BixbyDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
M Alejandra BedoyaDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Enju LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Delma Y JarrettDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Donna AgahigianDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Andy TsaiDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities.

objectiveTo propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy's 2D axial slice technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021-August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy's 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis.

resultsOur study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique.

conclusionThe 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy's 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.

Indexed as

Coxa ValgaAdolescentChildFemurHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLower ExtremityMaleReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed3D modelComputed tomographyFemoral antetorsionFemoral anteversionFemoral torsionFemoral versionHip imaging

Identifiers

PMID37740782
OpenAlexW4386988352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.