Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740775›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Genome assembly and analysis of Lactuca virosa: implications for lettuce breeding.

Wei Xiong, Dirk-Jan M van Workum, Lidija Berke, Linda V Bakker, Elio Schijlen, Frank F M Becker, Henri van de Geest, Sander Peters, Richard Michelmore, Rob van Treuren and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei XiongBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-5969
Dirk-Jan M van WorkumBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 633, Wageningen, 6700 AP, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-5499
Lidija BerkeBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-9462
Linda V BakkerBioscience, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Elio SchijlenBioscience, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Frank F M BeckerBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Henri van de GeestBioscience, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Sander PetersBioscience, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-5149
Richard MichelmoreThe Genome Center, Genome & Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California, Davis, 451 East Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616-8816, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7512-592X
Rob van TreurenCentre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands (CGN), Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-2449
Marieke JeukenPlant Breeding Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 386, Wageningen, 6700 AJ, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0567-9548
Sandra SmitBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 633, Wageningen, 6700 AP, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-5321
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-6565
Wageningen University & Research · NLGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a leafy vegetable crop with ongoing breeding efforts related to quality, resilience, and innovative production systems. To breed resilient and resistant lettuce in the future, valuable genetic variation found in close relatives could be further exploited. Lactuca virosa (2x = 2n = 18), a wild relative assigned to the tertiary lettuce gene pool, has a much larger genome (3.7 Gbp) than Lactuca sativa (2.5 Gbp). It has been used in interspecific crosses and is a donor to modern crisphead lettuce cultivars. Here, we present a de novo reference assembly of L. virosa with high continuity and complete gene space. This assembly facilitated comparisons to the genome of L. sativa and to that of the wild species L. saligna, a representative of the secondary lettuce gene pool. To assess the diversity in gene content, we classified the genes of the 3 Lactuca species as core, accessory, and unique. In addition, we identified 3 interspecific chromosomal inversions compared to L. sativa, which each may cause recombination suppression and thus hamper future introgression breeding. Using 3-way comparisons in both reference-based and reference-free manners, we show that the proliferation of long-terminal repeat elements has driven the genome expansion of L. virosa. Further, we performed a genome-wide comparison of immune genes, nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat, and receptor-like kinases among Lactuca spp. and indicated the evolutionary patterns and mechanisms behind their expansions. These genome analyses greatly facilitate the understanding of genetic variation in L. virosa, which is beneficial for the breeding of improved lettuce varieties.

Indexed as

LactucaPlant BreedingGenes, Plantcomparative genomicsgenome assemblyimmune geneslettucetransposable elements (TEs)

Identifiers

PMID37740775
PMCPMC10627274
OpenAlexW4386989073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.