ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Automated bone marrow cell classification through dual attention gates dense neural networks.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next Generation Digital Morphology: Blast Preclassification in Bone Marrow Aspirates.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Automated bone marrow cell classification using ensemble learning: performance, generalization, and clinical interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the practical application of the category-imbalanced myeloid cell classification model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Models for the marrow: A comprehensive review of AI-based cell classification methods and malignancy detection in bone marrow aspirate smears.HemaSphere · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe morphology of bone marrow cells is essential in identifying malignant hematological disorders. The automatic classification model of bone marrow cell morphology based on convolutional neural networks shows considerable promise in terms of diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. However, due to the lack of acceptable accuracy in bone marrow cell classification algorithms, automatic classification of bone marrow cells is now infrequently used in clinical facilities. To address the issue of precision, in this paper, we propose a Dual Attention Gates DenseNet (DAGDNet) to construct a novel efficient, and high-precision bone marrow cell classification model for enhancing the classification model's performance even further.
methodsDAGDNet is constructed by embedding a novel dual attention gates (DAGs) mechanism in the architecture of DenseNet. DAGs are used to filter and highlight the position-related features in DenseNet to improve the precision and recall of neural network-based cell classifiers. We have constructed a dataset of bone marrow cell morphology from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, which mainly consists of leukemia samples, to train and test our proposed DAGDNet together with the bone marrow cell classification dataset.
resultsWhen evaluated on a multi-center dataset, experimental results show that our proposed DAGDNet outperforms image classification models such as DenseNet and ResNeXt in bone marrow cell classification performance. The mean precision of DAGDNet on the Munich Leukemia Laboratory dataset is 88.1%, achieving state-of-the-art performance while still maintaining high efficiency.
conclusionOur data demonstrate that the DAGDNet can improve the efficacy of automatic bone marrow cell classification and can be exploited as an assisting diagnosis tool in clinical applications. Moreover, the DAGDNet is also an efficient model that can swiftly inspect a large number of bone marrow cells and offers the benefit of reducing the probability of an incorrect diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.