Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740636›Full record

ArticleTuberkuloz ve toraks2023

Delayed anaphylaxis due to Alpha-gal allergy: A modified desensitization protocol with red meat in an adult patient.

Fatma Merve Tepetam, Zeynep Yegin Katran, Ravza Bayraktar Barın, Betül Çakmak Uğurlu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Fatma Merve TepetamClinic of Immunology and Allergy, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Zeynep Yegin KatranClinic of Immunology and Allergy, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ravza Bayraktar BarınClinic of Immunology and Allergy, University of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Betül Çakmak UğurluClinic of Pulmonology, University of Health Sciences, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
University of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha-gal allergy is the sensitization to Alpha-gal present in saliva when a tick bites and the development of an IgE-mediated reaction to Alpha-gal also present in red meat by cross-reactivity. In contrast to other food allergies, symptoms occur as late as 2-6 hours after a meal. Prick to prick testing with nonmammalian meat in combination with cooked mammalian meat is recommended for diagnosis. However, the main diagnostic test is Alpha-gal sIgE> 0.1 IU/mL. The primary recommendation in patients with Alpha-gal syndrome is to prevent new tick bites and avoid all mammalian meats. Since most of the dishes in our country's food culture contain red meat, elimination diet may adversely affect patients quality of life. In the management of these patients, the option of desensitization with red meat can be considered by evaluating the benefit-risk ratio together with the patient. Our patient with a history of tick bites and a reaction pattern ranging from urticaria to anaphylaxis two hours after meat consumption was evaluated for Alpha gal allergy. The patient was found to be positive by prick-to-prick with cooked red meat. In addition, the high level of Alpha-gal specific IgE (27.3 Ku/L) confirmed the Alpha-gal allergy, and the decision to apply desensitization with red meat was taken. There are only two literatures on this subject, one of which includes two adult cases and the other a single pediatric case. Since a reaction developed in the fifth step of the 27-step desensitization scheme (Ünal et al.), which we took as a reference, which led to a dose increase of more than 100 times, we modified the protocol by using an intermediate steps. We repeated the prick-to-prick test with red meat after desensitization in our case who successfully completed the modified desensitization protocol. Observation of more than half reduction in test edema diameter concretely supports the success of our modified desensitization protocol.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisFood HypersensitivityRed MeatTick BitesAdultAnimalsChildHumansImmunoglobulin EMammalsQuality of LifeImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID37740636
PMCPMC10795274
OpenAlexW4386979670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.