Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740632›Full record

ArticleTuberkuloz ve toraks2023

A radiomics-based logistic regression model for the assessment of emphysema severity.

Mutlu Gülbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mutlu GülbayClinic of Radiology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to develop a model that differentiates between the radiological patterns of severe and mild emphysema using radiomics parameters, as well as to examine the parameters included in the model. Materials and Methods: Over the last 12 months, a total of 354 patients were screened based on the presence of terms such as “Fleischner”, “CLE”, and “centriacinar” in their thoracic CT reports, culminating in a study population of 82 patients. The study population was divided into Group 1 (Fleischner mild and moderate; n= 45) and Group 2 (Fleischner confluent and advanced destructive; n= 37). Volumetric segmentation was performed, focusing on the upper lobe segments of both lungs. From these segmented volumes, radiomics parameters including shape, size, first-order, and second-order features were calculated. The best model parameters were selected based on the Bayesian Information Criterion and further optimized through grid search. The final model was tested using 1000 iterations of bootstrap resampling. Results: In the training set, performance metrics were calculated with a sensitivity of 0.862, specificity of 0.870, accuracy of 0.863, and AUC of 0.910. Correspondingly, in the test set, these values were sensitivity= 0.848; specificity= 0.865; accuracy= 0.857; and AUC= 0.907. Conclusion: The logistic regression model, composed of radiomics parameters and trained on a limited number of cases, effectively differentiated between mild and severe radiological patterns of emphysema using computed tomography images.

Indexed as

EmphysemaPulmonary EmphysemaHumansLogistic ModelsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37740632
PMCPMC10795240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.