ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023
Body mass index effect on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery: a competing risk analysis.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this sudy was to investigate the presence of an obesity paradox on the long-term mortality of patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery and to uncover whether any discrepancy found could be attributable to cardiovascular or noncardiovascular causes.
methodsRetrospective analysis of 5242 consecutive patients with body mass index (BMI) over 18.5 kg/m2 undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, performed from 2000 to 2015, in a Portuguese level III Hospital. The primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were long-term cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular). We fitted overall, and cause-specific hazard models, with BMI forced both as a categorical (using World Health Organization predefined cutoffs) and as a continuous variable.
resultsFollow-up was 99.7% complete. The median follow-up time was 12.79 years (interquartile range, 9.51-16.61). The cumulative incidence functions failed to uncover any difference in 15-year all-cause (log-rank test, P = 0.400), cardiovascular (Gray's test, P = 0.996) and noncardiovascular mortality (Gray's test, P = 0.305) between BMI categories. Likewise, extensive multivariable-adjusted Cox regression and cause-specific hazards models failed to demonstrate in-between category differences, with BMI forced as a categorical variable. On the other hand, using BMI as a continuous variable, the model identified the optimal BMI as between 25.8 and 30.3 kg/m2 (nadir around 28.9 kg/m2), albeit this was dependent on the definition of the reference value.
conclusionsIn this longitudinal, population-level analysis of patients undergoing isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting, we could not attest to any protective effect of obesity on long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.