Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740222›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Small molecule targeting of the p38/Mk2 stress signaling pathways to improve cancer treatment.

D Alimbetov, B Umbayev, A Tsoy, D Begimbetova, T Davis, D Kipling, Sh Askarova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

D AlimbetovCreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA. alimbetov@uthscsa.edu.
B UmbayevCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
A TsoyCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
D BegimbetovaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
T DavisDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
D KiplingDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Sh AskarovaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan. shaskarova@nu.edu.kz.
Nazarbayev University · KZCardiff University · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakstan AP14871939Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakstan BR11765589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough a long-term goal of cancer therapy always has been the development of agents that selectively destroy cancer cells, more recent trends have been to seek secondary agents that sensitize cancer cells to existing treatment regimens. In this regard, the present study explored the possibility of using small molecule inhibitors of p38MAPK/MK2 stress signaling pathways as potential agents to enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells with abrogated G1 checkpoint to the DNA damaging agent etoposide by specifically targeting the DNA damage-induced G2 cell cycle checkpoint.

methodsWe have applied CCK8 and FACS-based viability assays and cell cycle analysis to investigate the effect of small molecules SB203580 and MK2.III on the sensitivity of small cell lung cancer cells (SCLC) that lack the G1 checkpoint to the DNA damaging agent Etoposide when used in combination. We have also assessed the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy on tumor xenograft suppression with etoposide and MK2.III in immunosuppressed mice. In addition, additional CCK8 cell viability analysis of the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line, and SW620, and SW480 colorectal cancer cell lines was performed.

resultsResults suggest that etoposide produces a profound effect on the cell cycle profile of cells in a manner that is consistent with the degree of cell viability that is seen using the viable cell assay. Results of the co-treatment experiments revealed that the p38/MK2 kinase inhibitors SB203580 and MK2.III both enhanced the DNA-damaging effects of etoposide on NCI-H69 cell viability in vitro. Results revealed that in vivo MK2.III was able to act as a chemosensitizer when used in combination with etoposide making NCI-H69 lung cancer cells sensitive to chemotherapeutic drug by 45% compared to single usage of the drug. We also report that MK2.III sensitizes metastatic cell lines SW-620 and MDA-MB-231 to etoposide but does not increase the sensitivity of non-metastasizing SW-480 colorectal cells to DNA damaging agent in vitro.

conclusionFindings reported in this study provide evidence that specific inhibitors of MK2 may indeed improve overall cancer therapy; however, their effectiveness depends on cell types.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsAnimalsCell SurvivalDrug Therapy, CombinationEtoposideHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceEtoposideCancerCell cyclep38/MK2 inhibitorsSCLCSmall molecules

Identifiers

PMID37740222
PMCPMC10517462
OpenAlexW4386979754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.