Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740150›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2023

Treatments for Dissecting Cellulitis of the Scalp: A Systematic Review and Treatment Algorithm.

Rahul Masson, Charlotte Y Jeong, Elaine Ma, Ashley B Crew, Natalie M Fragoso, Vivian Y Shi, Jennifer L Hsiao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp in a paediatric male.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul MassonKeck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Charlotte Y JeongCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Elaine MaKeck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ashley B CrewDepartment of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Ezralow Tower, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 5301, Los Angeles, CA, 90033-9174, USA.
Natalie M FragosoDepartment of Dermatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Vivian Y ShiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jennifer L HsiaoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Ezralow Tower, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 5301, Los Angeles, CA, 90033-9174, USA. j.hsiao.publications@gmail.com.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by abscesses, nodules, fistulas, and scarring alopecia. Management of this oftentimes debilitating dermatosis can be challenging due to its recalcitrant nature. There is limited data regarding the efficacy of treatment options for DCS.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to explore the efficacy and safety of reported DCS treatments.

methodsIn October 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on treatments for DCS. Studies that contained outcome efficacy data for DCS treatments were included. Reviews, conference abstracts, meta-analyses, commentaries, non-relevant articles, and articles with no full-text available were excluded. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers.

resultsA total of 110 relevant articles with 417 patients were identified. A majority of studies (86.4%) were case reports or series. Treatment options included systemic antibiotics, oral retinoids, biologics, procedural treatments, combination agents, and topical treatments. Oral retinoids and photodynamic therapy were the most extensively studied medical and procedural interventions, respectively.

conclusionOverall, randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate various treatment regimens for DCS and provide patients with a robust, evidence-based approach to therapy.

Indexed as

Dissecting cellulitis of the scalpMedicalProceduralSystematic reviewSystemicTherapyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37740150
PMCPMC10613185
OpenAlexW4386951224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.